Access Reviews primarily aim to ensure what security outcome?

Access Reviews primarily aim to ensure what security outcome?

• A. Regular checks on user access levels.
• B. Test solutions with real users before deployment.
• C. Analyze logs for suspicious activities.
• D. Use multi-factor methods to secure access.

Answer: (D)

Access reviews are about validating who has access to systems and ensuring privileges match current needs. The goal is to maintain least privilege by periodically verifying and recertifying user permissions and removing unnecessary access, which lowers the risk of someone having more access than they should or access that is no longer needed. While other practices matter—testing solutions with real users is about deployment readiness, analyzing logs focuses on detecting suspicious activity, and multi-factor authentication strengthens authentication—the primary purpose of access reviews is to confirm and adjust the actual access rights to align with roles and changes in responsibilities.

Access reviews are about validating who has access to systems and ensuring privileges match current needs. The goal is to maintain least privilege by periodically verifying and recertifying user permissions and removing unnecessary access, which lowers the risk of someone having more access than they should or access that is no longer needed. While other practices matter—testing solutions with real users is about deployment readiness, analyzing logs focuses on detecting suspicious activity, and multi-factor authentication strengthens authentication—the primary purpose of access reviews is to confirm and adjust the actual access rights to align with roles and changes in responsibilities.